Hasan Fero v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

Hasan Fero v. Eric Holder, Jr.

518 F. App'x 579

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 17, 2013

Docket11-71218

StatusUnpublished

This text of 518 F. App'x 579 (Hasan Fero v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hasan Fero v. Eric Holder, Jr., 518 F. App'x 579 (9th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners Hasan and Zumrut Fero challenge the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief.

1. The Feros did not challenge the BIA’s denial of their CAT claims in their opening brief and therefore their challenge is waived. See Castro-Martinez v. Holder, 674 F.3d 1073, 1082-83 (9th Cir.2011) (petitioner waived challenge to denial of CAT relief by not raising it in his opening brief).

2. The Feros did not exhaust the argument that their family constituted a social group and therefore this court lacks jurisdiction to review it. See Lee v. Holder, 599 F.3d 973, 976 (9th Cir.2010) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1)).

3. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that the Feros were not persecuted on account of their membership in a social group. The Feros’ purported social group — business owners who are indebted to the Turkish mafia — lacks both the social visibility and particularity to render it a social group. Apart from the fact that such individuals owe money to the mafia, there is no immutable characteristic or voluntary relationship tying them together. See Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that Colombian business owners who rejected demands by drug-traffickers to engage in illicit activity were not a social group because they were not bound by a voluntary relationship or innate characteristic).

PETITION DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners Hasan and Zumrut Fero challenge the BIA’s denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief.

1. The Feros did not challenge the BIA’s denial of their CAT claims in their opening brief and therefore their challenge is waived. See Castro-Martinez v. Holder, 674 F.3d 1073, 1082-83 (9th Cir.2011) (petitioner waived challenge to denial of CAT relief by not raising it in his opening brief).

2. The Feros did not exhaust the argument that their family constituted a social group and therefore this court lacks jurisdiction to review it. See Lee v. Holder, 599 F.3d 973, 976 (9th Cir.2010) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1)).

3. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that the Feros were not persecuted on account of their membership in a social group. The Feros’ purported social group — business owners who are indebted to the Turkish mafia — lacks both the social visibility and particularity to render it a social group. Apart from the fact that such individuals owe money to the mafia, there is no immutable characteristic or voluntary relationship tying them together. See Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that Colombian business owners who rejected demands by drug-traffickers to engage in illicit activity were not a social group because they were not bound by a voluntary relationship or innate characteristic).

PETITION DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

518 F. App'x 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hasan-fero-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack