Harwood v. State
This text of 16 Tex. Ct. App. 416 (Harwood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being no indictment or information in the record in this case, there is no legal foundation for the judgment of conviction, and it cannot, therefore, be permitted to stand. It appears that, after the conviction was had, the indictment was destroyed accidentally. It may yet be supplied, either by a second indictment by the grand jury, or by substitution in the mode provided by law. (Turner v. The State, ante, p. 378; Schultz v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 258.)
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Opinion delivered June 11, 1884,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Tex. Ct. App. 416, 1884 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harwood-v-state-texapp-1884.