Harwood v. Marye

8 Cal. 580
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 8 Cal. 580 (Harwood v. Marye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harwood v. Marye, 8 Cal. 580 (Cal. 1857).

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., and Field, J., concurring.

This action was instituted to foreclose a mortgage on land executed by George F. Marye and J. Caleb Smith.

The complaint, after setting out the note and mortgage sued on, alleges that Smith, one of the mortgagors, is dead; that one William Smith, a resident of Virginia, is his heir, and asks that service be made on the heir, by publication, which was done.

It does not appear whether there was any administrator of the estate of Smith; the plaintiff seems to have proceeded under the idea that the heir was the only person interested in or capable of exercising control over the real estate of the deceased.

This doctrine never obtained in California. By our statute “regulating the settlement of estates,” all property of the deceased, both real and personal, goes into the possession of the [581]*581administrator. The administrator being entitled to the possession of the real property, must be made a party to all suits affecting it. The complaint is therefore defective for want of proper parties.

Judgment reversed, and bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. American National Bank
74 P.2d 1051 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Anrud v. Scandinavian-American Bank
67 P. 364 (Washington Supreme Court, 1901)
Kelsey v. Welch
66 N.W. 390 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1896)
Robertson v. Burrell
42 P. 1086 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
Scoot v. Lloyd
16 Fla. 151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Cal. 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harwood-v-marye-cal-1857.