Harwood v. Grice

General Court of Virginia

Harwood v. Grice

2 Va. Col. Dec. 43

DecidedApril 15, 1735

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Va. Col. Dec. 43 (Harwood v. Grice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harwood v. Grice, 2 Va. Col. Dec. 43 (Va. Super. Ct. 1735).

Pincite

Opinion

The County Court refused to let an Ex’or be a Witness to prove a Will.

Randolph sayed it was the most known Thing in the World that an Executor might be a Witness If he was a Legatee he must release his Legacy

And per curiam he is a good witness Vide Tryl. per Pais 309. And quaere. In the Case of Hill ag’t Hill April 1737. The like Point was held in a Trial on a feigned Issue directed out of Chancery to try whether Will or no Will.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The County Court refused to let an Ex’or be a Witness to prove a Will.

Randolph sayed it was the most known Thing in the World that an Executor might be a Witness If he was a Legatee he must release his Legacy

And per curiam he is a good witness Vide Tryl. per Pais 309. And quaere. In the Case of Hill ag’t Hill April 1737. The like Point was held in a Trial on a feigned Issue directed out of Chancery to try whether Will or no Will.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Va. Col. Dec. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harwood-v-grice-vagensess-1735.