Harwood v. Dieckerhoff

117 U.S. 200, 6 S. Ct. 669, 29 L. Ed. 887, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1826
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 1, 1886
Docket944
StatusPublished

This text of 117 U.S. 200 (Harwood v. Dieckerhoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harwood v. Dieckerhoff, 117 U.S. 200, 6 S. Ct. 669, 29 L. Ed. 887, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1826 (1886).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This motion is denied on the authority of Jerome v. McCarter, 21 Wall. 17. “ The circumstances of the case, or of the parties,” ‘have not been so changed by the death of N. B. Har-wood, one of' the appellants, as to make “ the security, which; *201 at the time it was taken, was c good and sufficient,’ ” now insufficient. No personal decree is asked. The sole purpose of ■the suit is to subject the lands in question to the payment of debts of Harwood, the deceased appellant. The affidavits do not satisfy us that the property is depreciating in value by reason of any neglect of the surviving appellants in its care or management.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jerome v. McCarter
88 U.S. 17 (Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 U.S. 200, 6 S. Ct. 669, 29 L. Ed. 887, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harwood-v-dieckerhoff-scotus-1886.