Harwood v. AMP, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harwood v. AMP, Inc.

516 So. 2d 66, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2760, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11323, 1987 WL 2133

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 2, 1987

DocketNo. 87-710

StatusPublished

This text of 516 So. 2d 66 (Harwood v. AMP, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harwood v. AMP, Inc., 516 So. 2d 66, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2760, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11323, 1987 WL 2133 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs suit for breach of contract. We agree with the trial court that the complaint shows that the five year statute of limitations had expired because plaintiff had had notice more than five years before the suit was filed of the alleged breach. See Smith v. Continental Insurance Co., 326 So.2d 189, 191 (Fla. 2d DCA. 1976).

RYDER, A.C.J., LEHAN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs suit for breach of contract. We agree with the trial court that the complaint shows that the five year statute of limitations had expired because plaintiff had had notice more than five years before the suit was filed of the alleged breach. See Smith v. Continental Insurance Co., 326 So.2d 189, 191 (Fla. 2d DCA. 1976).

RYDER, A.C.J., LEHAN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 So. 2d 66, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2760, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11323, 1987 WL 2133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harwood-v-amp-inc-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack