Harwitz v. Cohen

138 Misc. 300, 245 N.Y.S. 350, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1602
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 138 Misc. 300 (Harwitz v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harwitz v. Cohen, 138 Misc. 300, 245 N.Y.S. 350, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The failure upon the termination of the trial to follow established procedure as to the form of judgment to be entered does not warrant an order made more than two months after the entry of the amended judgment herein vacating the judgment and amended judgment, it appearing that the real object in moving for the order was merely to procure an adjudication for costs. (Rosebrock Butter & Egg Co., Inc., v. Jorisch, 157 N. Y. Supp. 234.)

Judgments and order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosebrock Butter & Egg Co. v. Jorisch
157 N.Y.S. 234 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 Misc. 300, 245 N.Y.S. 350, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harwitz-v-cohen-nyappterm-1930.