Harwitz v. Cohen
This text of 138 Misc. 300 (Harwitz v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The failure upon the termination of the trial to follow established procedure as to the form of judgment to be entered does not warrant an order made more than two months after the entry of the amended judgment herein vacating the judgment and amended judgment, it appearing that the real object in moving for the order was merely to procure an adjudication for costs. (Rosebrock Butter & Egg Co., Inc., v. Jorisch, 157 N. Y. Supp. 234.)
Judgments and order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ. '
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 Misc. 300, 245 N.Y.S. 350, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harwitz-v-cohen-nyappterm-1930.