Harwell v. Cowan

165 S.E. 19, 175 Ga. 33, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 181
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1932·No. Nos. 8901, 8902·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Gilbert, J.

1. Every change in the personnel of a partnership, such as the withdrawal of a member or admitting a new one, works a dissolution. 20 R. C. L. 954, § 178; Richards v. Butter, 65 Ga. 593, 598 (2); Preston v. Garrard, 120 Ga. 689, 690 (48 S. E. 118, 102 Am. St. R. 124, 1 Ann. Cas. 724). Civil Code (1910) § 3162 does not state all of the means of dissolving a partnership.

2. “No partner, by assigning his interest or otherwise, can introduce a new partner without the consent of the others, unless such power is reserved in the contract.” Civil Code (1910), § 3173.

3. Under the pleadings and the evidence, considered in the light of both bills of exceptions, the decree rendered is not erroneous for any reason assigned. The judgments of which complaint is made are affirmed.

Judgments affirmed.

Russell, G. J., Beak, P. J., and Hill and Gilbert, JJ., concur. W. H. Terrell and W. G. Munday, for plaintiff. A. E. Wilson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harwell v. Cowan, 165 S.E. 19, 175 Ga. 33, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 181 (Ga. 1932).

165 S.E. 19 (Harwell v. Cowan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stolz v. Shulman
383 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Stone v. First National Bank
162 S.E.2d 217 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Henry v. Century Finance Co.
135 S.E.2d 342 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Coady v. Batchelder
335 P.2d 443 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1959)
Fenner & Beane v. Nelson
13 S.E.2d 694 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
King v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
187 S.E. 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Moncrief v. Rimer
181 S.E. 169 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)