Harvison v. Bridwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Harvison v. Bridwell

1915 OK 127, 147 P. 1197, 47 Okla. 33, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 104

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 2, 1915

Docket4471

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 127 (Harvison v. Bridwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvison v. Bridwell, 1915 OK 127, 147 P. 1197, 47 Okla. 33, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 104 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

KANE, C. J.

This cause comes to be heard upon a motion to dismiss, filed by the defendants in error. The motion to dismiss is supported by a verified affidavit, wherein it is shown that the controversy existing between plaintiff in error and defendants in error has been settled and their differences fully adjusted. As the motion is not resisted, nor the facts stated in the affidavit controverted, the motion must be sustained. No good purpose can be *34 subserved by permitting the cause to remain upon the docket of this court after the matter in controversy has been fully'settled between the parties. The appeal' is therefore dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KANE, C. J.

This cause comes to be heard upon a motion to dismiss, filed by the defendants in error. The motion to dismiss is supported by a verified affidavit, wherein it is shown that the controversy existing between plaintiff in error and defendants in error has been settled and their differences fully adjusted. As the motion is not resisted, nor the facts stated in the affidavit controverted, the motion must be sustained. No good purpose can be *34 subserved by permitting the cause to remain upon the docket of this court after the matter in controversy has been fully'settled between the parties. The appeal' is therefore dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 127, 147 P. 1197, 47 Okla. 33, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvison-v-bridwell-okla-1915.