Harville v. State
This text of 20 Ark. 76 (Harville v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court!
This was an indictment under sec. 21, of art. 9, chap. 51, G. Big., against Francis Harville, for fraudulently keeping in his possession and concealing the counterfeit resemblance of a bank note: conviction: motion in arrest of judgment, and for a new trial. Both motions were overruled, and he appealed.
The questions raised in this ease are the same as those decided in Mathena vs. The State, at the present term, and the judgment must be reversed. One additional objection, however, is taken to the indictment, which is, that it does not sufficiently aver the existence of the bank.
The averment would seem to be sufficient. Whart. Pr. 325; Sasser vs. The State, 13 Ohio 453.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ark. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harville-v-state-ark-1859.