Harvie v. Goodale

Ohio Court of Appeals

Harvie v. Goodale

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 198, 1928 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1115

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 23, 1928

DocketNo. 3105

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 198 (Harvie v. Goodale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvie v. Goodale, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 198, 1928 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1115 (Ohio Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PULL TEXT.

CUSHING, J.

This action was filed in the Court of Common Pleas to contest a will.

There were more than thirty defendants named in the petition, and about twenty-five of them were served; others weie not served.

The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Error is prosecuted to reverse that judgment.

Section 12,082 of the General Code of Ohio requires that the issue must be made up, if not by the pleadings, by an entry of the court. This question was discussed in the case of Perrine v. Perrine, et al, 18 Ohio App. 467, and, on authority of that case, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, will be reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions that the Court reinstate the case, make up the issue, bring in all the parties, and submit the question to a juiy.

(Hamilton, PJ., and Mills, J., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PULL TEXT.

CUSHING, J.

This action was filed in the Court of Common Pleas to contest a will.

There were more than thirty defendants named in the petition, and about twenty-five of them were served; others weie not served.

The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. Error is prosecuted to reverse that judgment.

Section 12,082 of the General Code of Ohio requires that the issue must be made up, if not by the pleadings, by an entry of the court. This question was discussed in the case of Perrine v. Perrine, et al, 18 Ohio App. 467, and, on authority of that case, the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County, Ohio, will be reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions that the Court reinstate the case, make up the issue, bring in all the parties, and submit the question to a juiy.

(Hamilton, PJ., and Mills, J., concur.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 198, 1928 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvie-v-goodale-ohioctapp-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack