Harvey's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Harvey's Appeal

35 Pa. 207

DecidedJuly 1, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Pa. 207 (Harvey's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey's Appeal, 35 Pa. 207 (Pa. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Woodward, J.

It is not necessary to discuss the effect of the deed of revocation, because the auditor ruled rightly, that Marshall Harvey took an absolute interest in the two-thirds of the surplus of the assigned estate. And that decides the only question on the record. If any authorities are necessary to be added to those cited by the auditor, they will be found collected in Smith’s Appeal, 12 Harris Id. 389; 9 Casey 85.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Woodward, J.

It is not necessary to discuss the effect of the deed of revocation, because the auditor ruled rightly, that Marshall Harvey took an absolute interest in the two-thirds of the surplus of the assigned estate. And that decides the only question on the record. If any authorities are necessary to be added to those cited by the auditor, they will be found collected in Smith’s Appeal, 12 Harris Id. 389; 9 Casey 85.

The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Pa. 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harveys-appeal-pa-1860.