Harvey Vs. Tegano

488 P.3d 583
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJune 22, 2021
Docket83000
StatusPublished

This text of 488 P.3d 583 (Harvey Vs. Tegano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey Vs. Tegano, 488 P.3d 583 (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MASON B. HARVEY, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 83000 MASON HARVEY AS TRUSTEE OF THE MASON HARVEY LIVING TRUST; MASON-BRANDON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A NEVADA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND MASON B. HARVEY, CHTD., A NEVADA FILED CORPORATION, JUN 1 2 2021 Appellants, ELIZA,BET 1A. BROWN vs. CLERK OF PREME COURT ANTHONY TEGANO, AN INDIVIDUAL; DEPU CLERK THE JIMMERSON LAW FIRM, F/K/A JIMMERSON HANSEN, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; SHARON CUSUMANO AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY TEGANO; AND SHARON CUSUMANO AS TRUSTE OF THE TEGANO FAMILY TRUST, Res • ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed on June 4, 2021 without payment of the requisite filing fee and without the case appeal statement. See NRAP 3(e), (f). That same day, this court issued notices directing appellants to file the case appeal statement and to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notices advised that failure to pay the filing fee would result in the dismissal of this appeal and failure to file the case appeal statement could result in sanctions, including dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellants have not paid the filing fee,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER

NI 1947 45005 t-vi-837 filed the case appeal statement, or otherwise responded to this court's notices. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.'

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

BY:

cc: Hon. Nadia Kra11, District Judge Essential Legal Services, LLC Marquis Aurbach Coffing Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, respondents motion to dismiss appeal is denied SUPREME COURT OF as moot. NEVADA

CLERK'S ORDER 2 O 1547

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 P.3d 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-vs-tegano-nev-2021.