Harvey v. Whitlatch
This text of 1 Mont. 713 (Harvey v. Whitlatch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was tried to a jury, at the July term, 1871, of the district court for Lewis and Clarke county, and at that term an order was made that judgment be entered upon the verdict. The judgment was not entered in pursuance of this order. At the February term, 1872, of said court, the plaintiff made a motion asking that judgment be entered nunc pro tunc, and judgment was entered accordingly. From the order causing judgment to be entered nunc pro tunc, the defendants appeal to this court. The failure to enter judgment upon the verdict, in pursuance of thei order therefor, was an omission or mistake of the clerk of court.
There was no error in the entry of the judgment nunc pro tunc. The court is master of its own records for the purpose of correcting clerical errors, and whenever - a clerk of court fails to enter judgment as ordered by the court to do, the court can cause such judgment to be entered at any succeeding term, provided such entry does not interfere with or affect the rights of third persons, and no such rights are presented or appear in this case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Mont. 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-whitlatch-mont-1873.