Harvey v. Ward

California Supreme Court

Harvey v. Ward

49 Cal. 124

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1874

DocketNo. 3,759

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 Cal. 124 (Harvey v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey v. Ward, 49 Cal. 124 (Cal. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

1. We think that the findings of the Court are sustained by the evidence.

2. There was no error in overruling the objection to the introduction of the judgment roll in the action of Harvey v. Finch. The objection taken was that the roll was “irrelevant, immaterial and not pertinent to any issue in this case.” The judgment roll was admissible as evidence tending to prove the indebtedness of Finch to the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

1. We think that the findings of the Court are sustained by the evidence.

2. There was no error in overruling the objection to the introduction of the judgment roll in the action of Harvey v. Finch. The objection taken was that the roll was “irrelevant, immaterial and not pertinent to any issue in this case.” The judgment roll was admissible as evidence tending to prove the indebtedness of Finch to the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed. Remittitur forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cal. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-ward-cal-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack