Harvey v. United States

86 F. Supp. 609, 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 853, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2270
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedSeptember 15, 1949
Docket47 C 1244
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 F. Supp. 609 (Harvey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey v. United States, 86 F. Supp. 609, 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 853, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2270 (N.D. Ill. 1949).

Opinion

IGOE, District Judge.

This cause duly came on for trial on May 19, 1949. Evidence was introduced by the parties and the cause was thereupon taken under advisement. The Court now makes and files herein the following:

Finding of Facts

1. This is a suit for recovery of Federal estate tax assessed against the estate of Arlington C. Harvey, deceased, and paid by plaintiff as executrix of said estate to the Collector of Internal Revenue at Chicago.

2. The death of said Arlington C. Harvey occurred on the 16th day of November, 1943, when he was a resident of Evanston, Cook County, Illinois.

3. Plaintiff was appointed executrix of the will and estate of said Arlington C. Harvey, deceased, by order entered on the 13th day of December, 1943, by the Probate Court of Cook County, Illinois; and at all times since she has continued to be and act as the fully authorized executrix of the said will and estate.

4. On October 11, 1944, plaintiff, acting as such executrix, filed with the Collector of Internal Revenue, Chicago, Illinois, the Estate Tax Return in the said estate of Arlington C. Harvey, deceased.

5. On June 21, 1945, the acting Internal Revenue Agent in Charge at Chicago made and mailed to plaintiff, as such executrix, a copy of his report of examination of said Estate Tax Return, and therein he stated a tax liability of said estate to the United States in the amount of $32,151.30.

6. On July 3, 1945, plaintiff, as such ex-cutrix, filed with the Internal Revenue Agent in Charge at Chicago her protest against said findings of the Acting Internal Revenue Agent in Charge; and requested a hearing with opportunity to present proofs; and thereafter hearings were held upon the said return and statement before a member of the staff of the Internal Revenue Agent in Charge at Chicago, and before the Chicago Division of the Technical Staff.

7. On June 14, 1946, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, by the Internal Revenue Agent in Charge at Chicago, mailed to plaintiff, as such executrix, a statement of determination of tax liability of said estate, asserting a deficiency in tax of $32,-151.30, and a copy thereof, marked Exhibit C, is attached to Exhibit 1, her Claim for Refund in her complaint.

8. On July 29, 1946, plaintiff, as such executrix, under protest, paid to the Collector of Internal Revenue at Chicago the tax so assessed in the amount of $32,151.-30, with interest in the amount of $2,817.42, making a total payment of $34,968.72.

The Collector to whom said payment was made was not in office as such collector at the time this action was commenced.

9. On the 24th day of September, 1946, plaintiff, as such executrix, filed with the said Collector of Internal Revenue, Chicago, her Claim for Refund of the said tax so paid, and a copy of her said Claim for Refund with attached Exhibits is attached to her Complaint as Exhibit 1, and the said Claim for Refund is in proper form.

10. The said Claim for Refund was duly forwarded to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue and was rejected by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and notice of such disallowance and rejection was mailed to plaintiff by the Internal Revenue Agent in Charge at Chicago, Illinois, bearing date February 18, 1947.

11. In her complaint, which was filed in this cause on August 27, 1947, plaintiff incorporates her said Claim for Refund and attached statements and documents wherein she states the transactions and matters asserted as grounds for her said Claim for *611 Refund; and said transactions are referred to hereinafter; and prays that judgment be entered in her favor and against defendant for the amount of said taxes by her paid with interest thereon and for costs of suit.

12. On October 29, 1947, on request of defendant, order was entered in this cause extending the time within which defendant may file its answer or otherwise plead to the complaint to include December 26, 1947.

13. On December 26, 1947, on request of defendant, order was entered in this cause extending time for defendant to answer to include March 26, 1948.

14. On February 20, 1948, defendant filed in this cause its Motion to Dismiss the complaint on the ground that the proper venue of this suit is in the Eastern District of Wisconsin and that complaint alleges that plaintiff resides at Broadlands Farm near North Prairie in the State of Wisconsin. Briefs of the parties were filed and the said motion was argued and overruled on April 9, 1948, and order was then entered overruling said motion.

15. On May 10, 1948, defendant filed its answer in this cause.

16. The issues and questions presented in this case are the following,-

A. Concerning the assessment by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, under the provisions of Section 811(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 811(e), of the entire value of the property held by the decedent and his wife in their two names at the time of his death. The property referred to by the Commissioner in said assessment is listed in the Estate Tax Return filed by the executrix, a copy whereof has been received in evidence.

B. Concerning the assessment of two certificates issued by Bell Savings and Loan Association and listed in said Estate Tax Return as No. 24 and No. 25 on Sheet E 5(B) of Schedule E of said return.

C. Concerning the assessment of certain of the certificates listed .in Sheet E 5(A) and Sheet E 5(B) of Schedule E of said return, and whether they were held in joint tenancy or in tenancy in common.

D. The assessment of the farm machinery and equipment listed in said Estate Tax Return on Sheets E 6(A) and E 6(B) of Schedule E of said return, as jointly held property.

E. The value for taxation of the residence property in Evanston, listed in said Estate Tax Return on Sheet E 1 of Schedule E of said return.

F. The insurance listed in said Estate Tax Return on Sheet VII, Schedule D of said return.

G. The deductions listed in said Estate Tax Return on Sheet XVIII, Schedule O of said return.

17. Arlington C. Harvey and Elizabeth C. Harvey were married in August, 1911, in Columbus, Ohio. At the time of their marriage, Mr. Harvey was 38 years of age and Mrs. Harvey was 23 years of age. They resided in or near that city until 1926, when they moved to Evanston, Illinois. They resided in Evanston until the death of Mr. Harvey in November, 1943. Elizabeth C. Harvey moved to Broadlands Farm, near the town of North Prairie, State of Wisconsin, in 1944, where she now resides. (Stip. 1 and 3.)

18. Arlington C. Harvey, during all his business life, was a lawyer and engaged in the practice of that profession. He was retained by Pure Oil Company (then of Columbus, Ohio, and now of Chicago) in 1916 or 1917. He was General Counsel of the company for many years. For his services he received a salary ranging from $10,000 in the early years to $18,000 per year after 1923. (Stip. 2.)

19. On- August 4, 1911, Arlington C, Harvey deeded to his wife, Elizabeth C. Harvey, the property in which they made their first home. This consisted of a house which he had built upon some lots owned by him. The conveyance was without monetary consideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crouch v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
909 F.2d 852 (Sixth Circuit, 1990)
Harvey v. United States
185 F.2d 463 (Seventh Circuit, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 F. Supp. 609, 38 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 853, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-united-states-ilnd-1949.