Harvey v. State

421 S.W.3d 584, 2014 WL 721154, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 204
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 2014·No. No. ED 100130·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Harvey appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Harvey contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call potential witnesses at trial and failing to object to the State’s cross-examination concerning his prior convictions. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for the decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harvey v. State, 421 S.W.3d 584, 2014 WL 721154, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 204 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

421 S.W.3d 584 (Harvey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.