Harvey v. State

146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 139, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 224
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1929
Docket19348
StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 520 (Harvey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey v. State, 146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 139, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 224 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the evidence, though conflicting, authorized the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 139, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-state-gactapp-1929.