Harvey v. State
146 So. 3d 66, 2014 WL 3756379, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11759
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2014·No. No. 5D13-2685·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s conviction, but remand to the circuit court to correct a scrivener’s error in the judgment and sentence, which indicates that Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere, rather than showing that Appellant was found guilty after a jury trial.
AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED to correct scrivener’s error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harvey v. State, 146 So. 3d 66, 2014 WL 3756379, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11759 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).
146 So. 3d 66 (Harvey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kevin Taylor v. State
242 So. 3d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Thomas v. State
174 So. 3d 599 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)