Harvey v. State
696 So. 2d 1292, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8164, 1997 WL 394835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harvey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 653 So. 2d 1146 →
Opinion
The appellant seeks reversal of his convictions on two counts of robbery with a firearm. We find no merit in the four issues he raises except with respect to a $2 cost assessment pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1995). Because that cost is a discretionary cost and was not announced at sentencing, it was improperly assessed. Therefore, we strike the $2 cost item. In all other respects, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harvey v. State, 696 So. 2d 1292, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8164, 1997 WL 394835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
696 So. 2d 1292 (Harvey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.