Harvey v. State

165 So. 703, 122 Fla. 518, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 896
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 165 So. 703 (Harvey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey v. State, 165 So. 703, 122 Fla. 518, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 896 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

*519 Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Whitfield, Mr. Presiding Justice Ellis, and Mr. Justice Buford, are of the opinion that the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Davis are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members' of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed, therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

AVhitfield, C. J., Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 So. 703, 122 Fla. 518, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-state-fla-1936.