Harvey v. Stanton

1 Gunby 87
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 87 (Harvey v. Stanton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey v. Stanton, 1 Gunby 87 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

C. J. Boatner, J.,

ad hoc. Where the lessee obtains and goes into possession under a lease from the agent of the owner of a certain tract of land, and subsequently obtains another lease from the owner, the second contract will be considered as merely ratifying the first, by which the lessee’s rights are to be determined.

2. The property leased being described as “ Ballina Plantation,” parol evidence is admissible to explain what the parties understood that description to include.

- 3. At the date of said lease, to the knowledge of both parties, a person was in possession of fifteen acres of land on Ballina Place, cleared and improved by him under a contract that h,e should' hold the same for a term of years, though his contract be unrecorded, he can maintain his possession, for the clearing made by him was not embraced, by fair construction, in the premises leased to the second lessee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Gunby 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-stanton-lactapp-1885.