Harvey v. St. Louis Art Museum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harvey v. St. Louis Art Museum

871 S.W.2d 135, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 1994 WL 57599

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 1, 1994·No. No. 64332·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge denying compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge denying compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Harvey v. St. Louis Art Museum, 871 S.W.2d 135, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 322, 1994 WL 57599 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

871 S.W.2d 135 (Harvey v. St. Louis Art Museum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.