Harvey v. Risien, LLC and Harvey v. Risien v. Missark Investments GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP Management, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 25, 2018
Docket04-18-00721-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Harvey v. Risien, LLC and Harvey v. Risien v. Missark Investments GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP Management, LLC (Harvey v. Risien, LLC and Harvey v. Risien v. Missark Investments GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP Management, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey v. Risien, LLC and Harvey v. Risien v. Missark Investments GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP Management, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 25, 2018

No. 04-18-00721-CV

HARVEY V. RISIEN, LLC and Harvey V. Risien, Appellants

v.

MISSARK INVESTMENTS GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP Management, LLC, Appellees

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CI15535 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

ORDER A filing fee of $205 was due when this appeal was filed, but it was not paid. See Tex. Sup. Ct., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, In Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015). The fee remains unpaid, and appellants have not filed a sworn statement of inability to afford payment of court costs.

We therefore order appellants, by November 5, 2018, to either: (1) pay the filing fee; or (2) provide written proof to this court that appellants are indigent or otherwise excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from prepaying fees and costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without advance payment of costs).

If appellants fail to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (providing appellate courts may enforce rule requiring payment of costs “by any order that is just”), 42.3(c) (permitting appellate courts to dismiss an appeal when appellant fails to comply with a court order).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harvey v. Risien, LLC and Harvey v. Risien v. Missark Investments GP, LLC, Missark Investments LP, JH Design LP, and GM GP Management, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-risien-llc-and-harvey-v-risien-v-missark-investments-gp-llc-texapp-2018.