Harvey v. Metz

271 A.D.2d 788

This text of 271 A.D.2d 788 (Harvey v. Metz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey v. Metz, 271 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Defendant Hong appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, denying his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, in an action for partition. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, the motion granted, with $10 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Upon the uncontradicted facts set forth in the moving affidavits, plaintiff did not have the legal title to the real property in suit requisite to the maintenance of an action for partition. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1012; Tracy Development Go. v. Becker, 212 N. Y. 488; Side v. Brenneman, 7 App. Div. 273; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 249 App. Div. 515.) We pass upon no other question. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tracy Development Co. v. . Becker
106 N.E. 330 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
Side v. Brenneman
7 A.D. 273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
O'Connor v. O'Connor
249 A.D. 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-metz-nyappdiv-1946.