Harvey v. Mahon

Fourth Circuit

Harvey v. Mahon

60 F. App'x 491

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 2003

DocketNo. 02-7705

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F. App'x 491 (Harvey v. Mahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey v. Mahon, 60 F. App'x 491 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ray Harvey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harvey v. Mahon, No. CA-02-829-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ray Harvey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harvey v. Mahon, No. CA-02-829-7 (W.D.Va. Sept. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F. App'x 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-mahon-ca4-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack