Harvey v. Lewis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harvey v. Lewis

99 S.E. 49, 23 Ga. App. 567, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 213

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1919

Docket10070

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 49 (Harvey v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey v. Lewis, 99 S.E. 49, 23 Ga. App. 567, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 213 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Motions for continuance of cases are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the court, and the party making such a motion must show that he has used due diligence. Civil Code (1910), §§ 5721-4. In this ease the trial judge did not abuse this discretion. See Blackwell v. Jennings, 128 Ba. 264 (57 S. E. 494). For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion to continue the case, or in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Motions for continuance of cases are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the court, and the party making such a motion must show that he has used due diligence. Civil Code (1910), §§ 5721-4. In this ease the trial judge did not abuse this discretion. See Blackwell v. Jennings, 128 Ba. 264 (57 S. E. 494). For no reason assigned did the court err in overruling the motion to continue the case, or in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 S.E. 49, 23 Ga. App. 567, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-lewis-gactapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack