Harvey v. Hwang

Ohio Supreme Court

Harvey v. Hwang

792 N.E.2d 197, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1509

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 30, 2003·No. 2003-1066·Published

Opinion

Madison App. No. CA2003-03-010. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 1-2 of the court of appeals’ Entry [1510] Granting Motion to Certify Conflict filed June 12, 2003:

“[W]hether Civ.R. 6(E) extends the time for filing a motion for new trial under Civ.R. 59(B) or motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict under Civ.R. 50(B) beyond 14 days after the entry of judgment when the judgment entry is mailed to the parties.”

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Larry Murphy Dump Truck Serv., Inc. u Sam Abdalla Ent. (1996), 114 Ohio App.3d 271, 683 N.E.2d 64.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madison App. No. CA2003-03-010. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 1-2 of the court of appeals’ Entry [1510] Granting Motion to Certify Conflict filed June 12, 2003:

“[W]hether Civ.R. 6(E) extends the time for filing a motion for new trial under Civ.R. 59(B) or motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict under Civ.R. 50(B) beyond 14 days after the entry of judgment when the judgment entry is mailed to the parties.”

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Larry Murphy Dump Truck Serv., Inc. u Sam Abdalla Ent. (1996), 114 Ohio App.3d 271, 683 N.E.2d 64.

Harvey v. Hwang, 792 N.E.2d 197, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1509 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

792 N.E.2d 197 (Harvey v. Hwang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related