Harvey v. Highsmith
This text of 136 S.E. 81 (Harvey v. Highsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To the petition in this ease the defendants filed a demurrer. Plaintiff filed an amendment before the hearing on the demurrer, and on the hearing the court made an order overruling the general demurrer (to which ruling no exception was filed), and also certain grounds of the special demurrer, and sustaining certain grounds of the special demurrer, with the privilege of amendment. The defendants then filed their general and special demurrers to the petition as amended; and the plaintiff again amended his petition in order to meet the special demurrers sustained, with privilege of amending. The defendants then made a motion to dismiss the petition as amended, and the court sustained the motion and dismissed the case. To this order the plaintiff excepted. Held, that the amendments substantially met the special demurrers, and the court erred in dismissing the ease on motion. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 S.E. 81, 163 Ga. 288, 1926 Ga. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-highsmith-ga-1926.