Harvey v. Harvey

1 Del. Cas. 342, 1793 Del. LEXIS 27
Delaware Circuit Court·Decided October 27, 1793·Published

Opinion

[By the] Court.

If an award be not made within the time

limited by a rule of reference, the rule is determined, if not continued by the consent of parties. We are clearly of opinion that during the continuance of the rule the plaintiff cannot discontinue. If he does it is irregular and will be struck off. The proper mode to get rid of a rule, is to apply to the Court to annul it; but the Court will never vacate the rule so as to defeat the agreement of the parties; but on the contrary will take care to carry the agreement into effect.

Rule to strike off the discontinuance made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harvey v. Harvey, 1 Del. Cas. 342, 1793 Del. LEXIS 27 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1793).

1 Del. Cas. 342 (Harvey v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.