Harvey v. Guilford Cty Dist. Attorneys Office

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Harvey v. Guilford Cty Dist. Attorneys Office

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided June 9, 2000·No. I.C. NO. TA-15954·Published

Opinion

Plaintiffs claim is against the Guilford County District Attorneys Office. The Industrial Commission has no jurisdiction over the District Attorneys Office as it is not a state agency or department as required by the Tort Claims Act. N.C. Gen. Stat.143-291 et seq.

Accordingly, plaintiffs claim against defendant is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This the ___ day of June 2000.

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

LKM/bjp

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs claim is against the Guilford County District Attorneys Office. The Industrial Commission has no jurisdiction over the District Attorneys Office as it is not a state agency or department as required by the Tort Claims Act. N.C. Gen. Stat.143-291 et seq.

Accordingly, plaintiffs claim against defendant is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This the ___ day of June 2000.

S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

LKM/bjp

Harvey v. Guilford Cty Dist. Attorneys Office, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2000).

Pincite

Harvey v. Guilford Cty Dist. Attorneys Office (Harvey v. Guilford Cty Dist. Attorneys Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.