Harvey v. Gargiulo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harvey v. Gargiulo

78 A.D.2d 528, 433 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12832

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 4, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 A.D.2d 528 (Harvey v. Gargiulo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey v. Gargiulo, 78 A.D.2d 528, 433 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Joseph Harvey as a candidate in the Liberal Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980 for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 32nd Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 18, 1980, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. By order dated August 26, 1980 this court remanded the matter to Special Term to make appropriate specific findings of fact with respect to its invalidation of appellant’s designating petition and held the appeal in abeyance in the interim. Special Term has now complied. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The findings of fact are sufficient to sustain Special Term’s determination. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Joseph Harvey as a candidate in the Liberal Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980 for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 32nd Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 18, 1980, which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. By order dated August 26, 1980 this court remanded the matter to Special Term to make appropriate specific findings of fact with respect to its invalidation of appellant’s designating petition and held the appeal in abeyance in the interim. Special Term has now complied. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The findings of fact are sufficient to sustain Special Term’s determination. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 528, 433 N.Y.S.2d 992, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-v-gargiulo-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack