Harvey v. Cline

Fourth Circuit

Harvey v. Cline

708 F. App'x 133

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2018·No. No. 17-1903·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not'binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Matthew Harvey appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harvey v. Cline, No. 2:15-cv-14091, 2017 WL 8274346, 2016 WL 3647962, 2016 WL 1562950 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2017; July 1, 2016; Apr. 18, 2016); see also Magee v. Racing Corp. of W. Va., 2017 WL 4993455 (W. Va. Nov. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not'binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Matthew Harvey appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harvey v. Cline, No. 2:15-cv-14091, 2017 WL 8274346, 2016 WL 3647962, 2016 WL 1562950 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2017; July 1, 2016; Apr. 18, 2016); see also Magee v. Racing Corp. of W. Va., 2017 WL 4993455 (W. Va. Nov. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Harvey v. Cline, 708 F. App'x 133 (4th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

708 F. App'x 133 (Harvey v. Cline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related