Harvey v. Citi Group Mortgage
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
ERIC HARVEY, etal., Case No. 24-10073 Plaintiffs, F. Kay Behm Vv. United States District Judge CIT| GROUP MORTGAGE, et al., Kimberly G. Altman United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. a OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MAY 2, 2024 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 33)
Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman’s May 2, 2024 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 33). Magistrate Judge Altman recommends denying Plaintiffs’ amended motion for a continuance, motion for an injunction and stay, amended motion for entry of default, and
motion for reconsideration of denial of clerk’s entry of default. (ECF Nos. 10, 13, 22, 28). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record
and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees
with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the court
ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 33) and DENIES Plaintiffs’ motions (ECF Nos. 10, 13, 22, 28). SO ORDERED.
Date: May 30, 2024 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harvey v. Citi Group Mortgage (Harvey v. Citi Group Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.