Harvey v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Harvey v. Angelone

35 F. App'x 96

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 23, 2002·No. No. 02-6059·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William H. Harvey seeks to appeal the distinct court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harvey v. Angelone, No. CA-01-943-AM (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 10, 2001; entered Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

William H. Harvey seeks to appeal the distinct court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harvey v. Angelone, No. CA-01-943-AM (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 10, 2001; entered Dec. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Harvey v. Angelone, 35 F. App'x 96 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

35 F. App'x 96 (Harvey v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related