Harvey Rim & Wheel Co. v. Jamestown Die & Tool Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harvey Rim & Wheel Co. v. Jamestown Die & Tool Corp.

202 A.D. 780

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1922

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D. 780 (Harvey Rim & Wheel Co. v. Jamestown Die & Tool Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey Rim & Wheel Co. v. Jamestown Die & Tool Corp., 202 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Held, we are of the opinion that this case falls within the rule of Untermyer v. Beinhauer (105 N. Y. 521) and is distinguished from the ease of Sterling Engine Co. v. Church (197 App. Div. 924) in that it was necessary in the latter ease to prove the various items set forth in the complaint and bill of particulars in order to make out a cause of action. All concur. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Held, we are of the opinion that this case falls within the rule of Untermyer v. Beinhauer (105 N. Y. 521) and is distinguished from the ease of Sterling Engine Co. v. Church (197 App. Div. 924) in that it was necessary in the latter ease to prove the various items set forth in the complaint and bill of particulars in order to make out a cause of action. All concur. ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-rim-wheel-co-v-jamestown-die-tool-corp-nyappdiv-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack