Harvey Rim & Wheel Co. v. Jamestown Die & Tool Corp.
202 A.D. 780
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Held, we are of the opinion that this case falls within the rule of Untermyer v. Beinhauer (105 N. Y. 521) and is distinguished from the ease of Sterling Engine Co. v. Church (197 App. Div. 924) in that it was necessary in the latter ease to prove the various items set forth in the complaint and bill of particulars in order to make out a cause of action. All concur. ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harvey Rim & Wheel Co. v. Jamestown Die & Tool Corp., 202 A.D. 780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
202 A.D. 780 (Harvey Rim & Wheel Co. v. Jamestown Die & Tool Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Untermyer v. . Beinhauer
11 N.E. 847 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Sterling Engine Co. v. Church
197 A.D. 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)