Harvey N. Mighell v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Harvey N. Mighell v. United States

249 F.2d 319

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 7, 1957

Docket5635_1

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 319 (Harvey N. Mighell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey N. Mighell v. United States, 249 F.2d 319 (10th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

249 F.2d 319

Harvey N. MIGHELL
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5635.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 7, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

Schrempp & Lathrop, Omaha, Neb., and Driscoll & Driscoll, Russell, Kan., for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

249 F.2d 319

Harvey N. MIGHELL
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5635.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 7, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

Schrempp & Lathrop, Omaha, Neb., and Driscoll & Driscoll, Russell, Kan., for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F.2d 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-n-mighell-v-united-states-ca10-1957.