Harvey N. Mighell v. United States

249 F.2d 319

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harvey N. Mighell v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 233 F.2d 731 →

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided September 7, 1957·No. 5635_1·Published

Opinion

249 F.2d 319

Harvey N. MIGHELL
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5635.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 7, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

Schrempp & Lathrop, Omaha, Neb., and Driscoll & Driscoll, Russell, Kan., for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

249 F.2d 319

Harvey N. MIGHELL
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 5635.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

September 7, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

Schrempp & Lathrop, Omaha, Neb., and Driscoll & Driscoll, Russell, Kan., for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U. S. Atty., Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute the same.

Harvey N. Mighell v. United States, 249 F.2d 319 (10th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

249 F.2d 319 (Harvey N. Mighell v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.