Harvey L. Plotts v. Elliott Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
This text of 436 F.2d 1376 (Harvey L. Plotts v. Elliott Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by plaintiff Harvey L. Plotts from order of the District Court dated June 1, 1970, and order denying rehearing or remand dated July 2, 1970. The trial court upheld the determination of the Secretary that plaintiff has not established that he is unable to engage in any substantial qualified activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to last for a continuing period of twelve months as required by 42 U.S. C.A. § 423(d)(1)(A), as amended.
The court also determined that plaintiff has failed to show good cause for a remand to the Secretary for the recep *1377 tion of further evidence and considerations.
We have examined the record and agree with the trial court. Plaintiff has been given a full and fair administrative hearing and has been afforded repeated opportunities to present any relevant evidence. The trial court committed no error in its determination that the denial of plaintiff’s disability claim is supported by substantial evidence. The court properly applied the law to the facts.
The judgment dismissing plaintiff’s petition is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 F.2d 1376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-l-plotts-v-elliott-richardson-secretary-of-the-department-of-ca8-1971.