Harvey Gordon, Inc. v. Testa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harvey Gordon, Inc. v. Testa

413 So. 2d 408, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19495

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 1982

DocketNo. 81-1707

StatusPublished

This text of 413 So. 2d 408 (Harvey Gordon, Inc. v. Testa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvey Gordon, Inc. v. Testa, 413 So. 2d 408, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19495 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In an action to enforce a foreign judgment, the trial court may not entertain a counterclaim based on perjured testimony in support of the judgment. See, e.g., Haas v. Haas, 59 So.2d 640 (Fla.1952); Fair v. Tampa Electric Co., 158 Fla. 15, 27 So.2d 514 (1946); City of Miami v. Coconut Grove Marine Properties, Inc., 358 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 372 So.2d 932 (Fla.1979).

We treat the Petition for writ of prohibition as certiorari and grant same on a finding that the action of the trial court constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of the law.

The order under review is quashed and the cause is remanded with instructions [409]*409that the court not consider the defenses or counterclaim asserted except the defense which challenges the finality of the judgment sought to be enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI