Harvey E. Barnhart, Jr. v. United States Postal Service
This text of 56 F.3d 81 (Harvey E. Barnhart, Jr. v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 81
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Harvey E. BARNHART, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 95-3405.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
May 10, 1995.
ORDER
Petitioner having paid the required filing fee, it is ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.
Petitioner's brief is due on or before July 10, 1995.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 81, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19638, 1995 WL 305162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-e-barnhart-jr-v-united-states-postal-servic-cafc-1995.