Harvey, Donny Joel

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 20, 2008
DocketWR-9,425-23
StatusPublished

This text of Harvey, Donny Joel (Harvey, Donny Joel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey, Donny Joel, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. WR-9,425-23




EX PARTE DONNY JOEL HARVEY, Applicant





ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 14,130-H IN THE 23RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM BRAZORIA COUNTY




           Per curiam.


O R D E R


            Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of escape and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.

            Applicant contends, inter alia, that he was improperly denied the assistance of counsel in a 2006 release revocation hearing. He also contends that he was prevented by his parole officer and the hearing officer from contacting and presenting witnesses and obtaining and presenting documentary evidence in defense and mitigation.

            Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In addition, the trial court shall obtain copies of the notice of release revocation, the revocation hearing report, and any other documentation of the revocation proceedings that would be helpful to resolving Applicant’s contentions, above, from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel.

            If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

            The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was properly denied the assistance of counsel and whether Applicant was prevented from presenting witnesses and documentary evidence in defense and mitigation. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims for habeas corpus relief.

            This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A transcript containing copies of the release revocation paperwork and all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 20, 2008

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harvey, Donny Joel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-donny-joel-texcrimapp-2008.