Harvey & Diana Kloesel and Sid & Judy Simpson, Robert and Marlene Laird, Dale Steinhauser & Jamie Steinhauser, Individually and Behalf of Theodore Steinhauser, a Minor, Scott Mica, Liza Mica & Donald R. Duet v. Montgomery & Collins, Inc. of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 3, 2005
Docket13-04-00629-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Harvey & Diana Kloesel and Sid & Judy Simpson, Robert and Marlene Laird, Dale Steinhauser & Jamie Steinhauser, Individually and Behalf of Theodore Steinhauser, a Minor, Scott Mica, Liza Mica & Donald R. Duet v. Montgomery & Collins, Inc. of Texas (Harvey & Diana Kloesel and Sid & Judy Simpson, Robert and Marlene Laird, Dale Steinhauser & Jamie Steinhauser, Individually and Behalf of Theodore Steinhauser, a Minor, Scott Mica, Liza Mica & Donald R. Duet v. Montgomery & Collins, Inc. of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harvey & Diana Kloesel and Sid & Judy Simpson, Robert and Marlene Laird, Dale Steinhauser & Jamie Steinhauser, Individually and Behalf of Theodore Steinhauser, a Minor, Scott Mica, Liza Mica & Donald R. Duet v. Montgomery & Collins, Inc. of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion




NUMBER 13-04-629-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________________________________________


HARVEY AND DIANA KLOESEL, ET AL.,                            Appellants,


v.


MONTGOMERY & COLLINS, INC. OF TEXAS,

ET AL.,                                                                           Appellees.

_______________________________________________________


On appeal from the 25th District Court

 of Lavaca County, Texas


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellants, HARVEY & DIANA KLOESEL, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 25th District Court of Lavaca County, Texas. On December 10, 2004, the trial court granted appellants’ motion for new trial.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the trial court’s order granting a new trial, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                                                 PER CURIAM


Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 3rd day of March, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harvey & Diana Kloesel and Sid & Judy Simpson, Robert and Marlene Laird, Dale Steinhauser & Jamie Steinhauser, Individually and Behalf of Theodore Steinhauser, a Minor, Scott Mica, Liza Mica & Donald R. Duet v. Montgomery & Collins, Inc. of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvey-diana-kloesel-and-sid-judy-simpson-robert-and-marlene-laird-texapp-2005.