Harvard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harvard v. State

756 So. 2d 1043, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3928, 2000 WL 345765

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 2000

DocketNo. 2D98-2980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 756 So. 2d 1043 (Harvard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harvard v. State, 756 So. 2d 1043, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3928, 2000 WL 345765 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal, appellant’s counsel states that appellant’s probation was properly revoked on the basis of his termination from the PAR program and his possession of cocaine. Our review of the record leads us to agree with counsel that the violations were willful and substantial and that the revocation was proper. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation, we remand to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation. See Cornett v. State, 506 So.2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Givens v. State, 666 So.2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal, appellant’s counsel states that appellant’s probation was properly revoked on the basis of his termination from the PAR program and his possession of cocaine. Our review of the record leads us to agree with counsel that the violations were willful and substantial and that the revocation was proper. However, because the record does not contain a written order of revocation, we remand to the trial court for entry of a written order of revocation. See Cornett v. State, 506 So.2d 88 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Givens v. State, 666 So.2d 235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Remanded with directions.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

756 So. 2d 1043, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3928, 2000 WL 345765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvard-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack