Harvard State Bank v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Supreme Court

Harvard State Bank v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

311 U.S. 717

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 6, 1940·No. Nos. 598 and 599·Published

Opinion

On consideration'of the suggestion of a diminution of the record and motion for a writ of certiorari in that relation, the motion for a writ of certiorari is granted. The petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and to the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland is denied.

Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On consideration'of the suggestion of a diminution of the record and motion for a writ of certiorari in that relation, the motion for a writ of certiorari is granted. The petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and to the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland is denied.

Mr. Justice Roberts and Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration and decision of these applications.

Harvard State Bank v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 311 U.S. 717 (1940).

Pincite

311 U.S. 717 (Harvard State Bank v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.