Harvard Financial Corp. v. Greenblatt Construction Co.
This text of 236 A.D. 742 (Harvard Financial Corp. v. Greenblatt Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents. No opinion. Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Carswell, J., dissent with the following memorandum: With the exception of the overhead shore beams, no damage to the realty [743]*743would attend the removal of the elevator apparatus. Those beams would not seem to be part of the elevator as such and may not be a basis for distinguishing this case from Greater New York Development Co. v. Ka-Ro Building Corp. (232 App. Div. 696; affd., 256 N. Y. 657). The dissent is on the theory that the removal would cause no “ material ” damage.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harvard-financial-corp-v-greenblatt-construction-co-nyappdiv-1932.