Hartzog v. Eubanks

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Hartzog v. Eubanks

202 So. 2d 658, 251 La. 50, 1967 La. LEXIS 2456

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 6, 1967

DocketNo. 48866

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 202 So. 2d 658 (Hartzog v. Eubanks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hartzog v. Eubanks, 202 So. 2d 658, 251 La. 50, 1967 La. LEXIS 2456 (La. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal the result reached by the court is correct.

HAMITER, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be granted to allow consideration of the application of the doctrine of last chance.

SANDERS, J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted. However, he expresses no opinion at this time as to the result to be reached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI