Harty v. Moses

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harty v. Moses

12 A.D.2d 582, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 582 (Harty v. Moses) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harty v. Moses, 12 A.D.2d 582, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before January 3, 1961, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points on the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before January 3, 1961, with notice of argument for the February 1961 Term of this court, said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens, Eager and Noonan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 582, 214 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harty-v-moses-nyappdiv-1960.