Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.

453 F. App'x 347

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2011·No. No. 10-2375·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Owen Harty appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., 747 F.Supp.2d 547 (E.D.N.C.2010); (Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Owen Harty appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., 747 F.Supp.2d 547 (E.D.N.C.2010); (Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., 453 F. App'x 347 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

453 F. App'x 347 (Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related