Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.

453 F. App'x 347
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2375
StatusPublished

This text of 453 F. App'x 347 (Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., 453 F. App'x 347 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Owen Harty appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., 747 F.Supp.2d 547 (E.D.N.C.2010); (Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.
747 F. Supp. 2d 547 (E.D. North Carolina, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F. App'x 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harty-v-luihn-four-inc-ca4-2011.