Hartwig v. Bay State Shoe & Leather Co.

2 Silv. Ct. App. 437, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 954
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Silv. Ct. App. 437 (Hartwig v. Bay State Shoe & Leather Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartwig v. Bay State Shoe & Leather Co., 2 Silv. Ct. App. 437, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 954 (N.Y. 1889).

Opinion

Follett, Ch. J.

The plaintiff was negligent in attempting to adjust the mold while the press was in motion, and also in putting the finger which was injured on the top of the mold instead of its side when attempting. to adjust it. Each of these acts contributed to the injury and the trial court erred in refusing the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

Potter, Vann, and‘Parker, JJ., concur. Brown, J. not sitting. Bradley and Haight, JJ., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Silv. Ct. App. 437, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartwig-v-bay-state-shoe-leather-co-ny-1889.