Hartwell v. Penn Fire Ins.

60 N.H. 293
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.H. 293 (Hartwell v. Penn Fire Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hartwell v. Penn Fire Ins., 60 N.H. 293 (N.H. 1880).

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

If the plaintiff has a defence to the. award, it is available in equity only; for the settled doctrine in this state is, that a written common-law award upon a' written submission cannot be disputed in an action upon it at law for any error or defect not apparent upon the record, — that is to say, the submission and award (Truesdale v. Straw, 58 N. H. 208) ; and if it cannot be so impeached when it is the subject of an action, there is no ground for holding that it can be when pleaded as a defence.

The plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover only the amounts confessed, with costs t.o the filing of confession, and the defendants will take costs since.

Ordered accordingly.

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 N.H. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hartwell-v-penn-fire-ins-nh-1880.